Comments on: Apostles’ Creed

By: Lori Jones

Lori Jones — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:01:21 +0000

I have always thought it was beautiful and needs no editing.

By: KM

KM — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:21:41 +0000

Am fascinated, Dean.

What do you think ye olde judgment gets in the way of, and what’s the value of the “everlasting” life at the end?
Might we not, if we assume we only have 60-90 years, be more diligent about making the most good out of those years?
Is it more about impact than duration for you?

By: Bells

Bells — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:33:37 +0000

I like it. It’s a beautiful rewording.

By: Philip

Philip — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:05:52 +0000

The contextualised version is pagan in its language and could be interpreted in different ways.
The original Creed is concise and direct, tracing its source to God’s Word, the Bible.
Where is the reference to the Trinity, the resurrection, sin and final judgement? Effectively removed. Traditional Christian doctrine is lost.

A whole-hearted commitment to the truth of God’s Word is true integrity.

Thank you for expressing your thoughts here.